[HTML][HTML] Task-dependent V1 responses in human retinitis pigmentosa
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2010•arvojournals.org
Purpose.: During measurement with functional MRI (fMRI) during passive viewing, subjects
with macular degeneration (MD) have a large unresponsive lesion projection zone (LPZ) in
V1. fMRI responses can be evoked from the LPZ when subjects engage in a stimulus-related
task. The authors report fMRI measurements on a different class of subjects, those with
retinitis pigmentosa (RP), who have intact foveal vision but peripheral visual field loss.
Methods.: The authors measured three RP subjects and two control subjects. fMRI was …
with macular degeneration (MD) have a large unresponsive lesion projection zone (LPZ) in
V1. fMRI responses can be evoked from the LPZ when subjects engage in a stimulus-related
task. The authors report fMRI measurements on a different class of subjects, those with
retinitis pigmentosa (RP), who have intact foveal vision but peripheral visual field loss.
Methods.: The authors measured three RP subjects and two control subjects. fMRI was …
Abstract
Purpose.: During measurement with functional MRI (fMRI) during passive viewing, subjects with macular degeneration (MD) have a large unresponsive lesion projection zone (LPZ) in V1. fMRI responses can be evoked from the LPZ when subjects engage in a stimulus-related task. The authors report fMRI measurements on a different class of subjects, those with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), who have intact foveal vision but peripheral visual field loss.
Methods.: The authors measured three RP subjects and two control subjects. fMRI was performed while the subjects viewed drifting contrast pattern stimuli. The subjects passively viewed the stimuli or performed a stimulus-related task.
Results.: During passive viewing, the BOLD response in the posterior calcarine cortex of all RP subjects was in phase with the stimulus. A bordering, anterior LPZ could be identified by responses that were in opposite phase to the stimulus. When the RP subjects made stimulus-related judgments, however, the LPZ responses changed: the responses modulated in phase with the stimulus and task. In control subjects, the responses in a simulated V1 LPZ were unchanged between the passive and the stimulus-related judgment conditions.
Conclusions.: Task-dependent LPZ responses are present in RP subjects, similar to responses measured in MD subjects. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that deleting the retinal input to the LPZ unmasks preexisting extrastriate feedback signals that are present across V1. The authors discuss the implications of this hypothesis for visual therapy designed to replace the missing V1 LPZ inputs and to restore vision.
ARVO Journals